Train


“The only thing worse than training your employees and having them leave is not training them and having them stay.”

- Henry Ford

To meet the challenge of teaching so that every single student in a class learns, we face the challenge of ensuring that our colleagues are active learners. David Weston was close to getting it right when he said, “If we are going to have more schools where teachers keep improving, we need to [make] staff learning just as much of a priority as student learning”. I say David was close to getting it right, because what we really need to do is put teacher learning first, and then, when our teachers become increasingly good teachers, our students will make even better progress.

Any teacher, at any stage of his or her career, has to accept, continuously, the professional obligation to improve his or her teaching. Period. And once the teacher has accepted that obligation, the school has to accept the responsibility of providing the very best teacher learning opportunities. School leaders cannot just wish teachers to improve their teaching.

School leaders have to put their staff’s learning needs first, before those of the students. It is the most effective way of creating an expert teaching team.

So, what does such a professional learning programme look like?

First, you have to make the time for teachers to improve their practice. Teacher learning time has to be woven into the fabric of a school’s structure. Any logistical hurdles can be overcome if providing time for staff to work on their practice is genuinely prioritised. Tom Bentley said at a NCTL conference in 1996 that “once you have found your core purpose, change your school’s existing structures to accommodate your core purpose rather than accommodate your core purpose around your existing structures”. If the development of teaching and learning is your priority, you have to find the hours during the school week for your staff to work on their practice. No ifs, no buts. You must not expect them to do it all in their own time.

Beyond finding the time for teachers to focus upon their learning, you need to ensure that you provide high quality training. If improving the quality of teaching is so difficult, then you need to follow two principles when designing teacher learning opportunities. Firstly, you need to scrutinise diagnostically the impact that current teaching is having upon students’ learning in order to identify as well as you possibly can which specific area of practice requires improvement; secondly, you need to turn to educational research to see what the evidence says has the best chance of working within the area of your practice you have identified warrants improvement.

When it comes to supporting teacher improvement, there is no one better than Professor Viviane Robinson. Her little cited but brilliant book, Student-Centred Leadership centres on my favourite issue: the golden thread from school leadership to student outcomes. Robinson’s conclusion, having surveyed the research on how leaders make the most meaningful difference in schools, is clear: The more leaders focus on their relationships, their work, and their learning on the core business of teaching and learning, the greater will be their influence on student outcomes. Head teachers who are really doing their job effectively know this instinctively; what’s so great about Robinson’s book is that she has the empirical evidence to support this claim.

It is hard to create a culture where teachers are honest with school leaders about the challenges they face in their teaching, if the school leaders are not perceived as competent about teaching and learning, what Robinson calls “the work”.  If school leaders are going to put staff first, they need, then, to become experts in teaching and learning. They need to accept the professional obligation to get better themselves; that can require significant levels of commitment to their own learning.

School structures which have informed leaders of teacher learning and time for teachers to work on improving practice, also require coherence with a school’s Performance Management system. A feature of a mature, coherent model of Performance Development and related CPD programme is the Inquiry Question Process (IQP). All teachers and Teaching Assistants identify a feature of their practice which they would like to develop and then they evaluate that development of their practice against its impact upon their students’ performance. The success is completing the disciplined inquiry itself, not whether the intervention worked. 

Five Putting Staff First blueprint bullets: Training

  • Focus upon aspects of teaching and learning which have been prioritised diagnostically

  • Underpin teacher learning with research evidence

  • Allocate significant amounts of frequent, regular, ring-fenced pockets of time, which are sustained over time as part of a repeated cycle

  • Make teacher development opportunities multi-layered so that teachers at all stages of their career feel nourished

  • SLT must prioritise teacher learning over everything else that happens in school.